League Two
Match Analysis
Salford City
Fleetwood Town
Salford City
D
W
W
L
L
L
Fleetwood Town
W
D
W
D
D
W
What do these metrics mean?
- Strength
- Recent form points from the last several matches. Higher means a better recent run of results.
- Shot Conversion
- Goals scored divided by total shots taken (rolling window of past matches). Measures finishing efficiency — only available when historical shot data exists.
- Shots on Target
- Proportion of shots that were on target. Reflects shot accuracy and discipline — only available when historical shot data exists.
- Possession
- Average ball possession percentage over recent matches. Indicates territorial dominance — only available when historical stats exist.
- Save Rate
- Goalkeeper saves divided by shots faced. Higher means the keeper is denying more chances — only available when historical stats exist.
- Attacking Potential
- Composite index from goals, expected goals and shots (weighted). Only available when full shot stats are tracked for a team.
- Defensive Potential
- Composite index from goals conceded, saves and blocked shots (weighted). Only available when full shot stats are tracked.
- Expected Goals
- Poisson-estimated goals each team is likely to score, derived from season attack/defence averages and opponent strength.
- Head to Head
- Historical win share across all previous meetings between these two teams (home wins | draws | away wins).
- Wins the Game
- Machine learning win probability — the model's confidence that each team wins this match outright.
Head to Head History
| Home Team | Away Team | Score | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salford City | Fleetwood Town | 0 - 0 | December 29, 2025 |
| Fleetwood Town | Salford City | 1 - 1 | December 9, 2025 |
| Salford City | Fleetwood Town | 0 - 2 | January 18, 2025 |
| Fleetwood Town | Salford City | 2 - 2 | October 29, 2024 |
Salford City Form (Last 6 Matches)
| Date | Venue | Opponent | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 26 | Away | Rotherham | 3 - 3 | Draw |
| Sep 5, 26 | Home | Port Vale | 1 - 0 | Win |
| Sep 1, 26 | Home | Newport County | 2 - 1 | Win |
| Aug 29, 26 | Away | Shrewsbury | 1 - 0 | Loss |
| Aug 22, 26 | Home | Chesterfield | 0 - 1 | Loss |
| Aug 15, 26 | Away | Barnet | 3 - 1 | Loss |
Fleetwood Town Form (Last 6 Matches)
| Date | Venue | Opponent | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 26 | Home | Sheffield Utd | 1 - 0 | Win |
| Sep 12, 26 | Away | Newport County | 1 - 1 | Draw |
| Sep 5, 26 | Home | Shrewsbury | 2 - 0 | Win |
| Sep 1, 26 | Home | Oldham | 1 - 1 | Draw |
| Aug 29, 26 | Away | Grimsby | 2 - 2 | Draw |
| Aug 25, 26 | Home | Shrewsbury | 4 - 0 | Win |
League Two Table
| Pos | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fleetwood Town | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 9 |
| 15 | Salford City | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
Predictions
Salford City to win
This prediction indicates that Salford City has a 41.21% likelihood to win the match. The likelihood for the match to end as a draw is 30.57 %Under 1.5 goals
This prediction indicates that there is a 50.53% likelihood that by the end of the football match, there will be less than two goals scored.Under 2.5 goals
This prediction indicates that there is a 51.56% likelihood that by the end of the football match, there will be less than three goals scored.Most Likely Scorelines
Subscribe to unlock scoreline predictions
View plans
League Two
Walsall vs Port Vale
9 hours from now · 2:30 p.m.
›
Salford City vs Swindon Town
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Grimsby vs Crawley Town
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Crewe vs Shrewsbury
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Rochdale vs Oldham
9 hours from now · 2:30 p.m.
›
Gillingham vs Bristol Rovers
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Colchester vs Cheltenham
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Accrington ST vs Newport County
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Exeter City vs Tranmere
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Chesterfield vs York
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Northampton vs Rotherham
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Barnet vs Fleetwood Town
12 hours from now · 5 p.m.
›
Comments